The assertion's clearly blocking testing, but I'm not sure it's not an
error for two move explanations to want to co-exist. For now they're
concatenated.
I was getting language name and iso code confused so adding a new type
to keep them separate. Keep string type for crossing JNI boundary and
passing as param e.g. in URLs and Bundles.
I want receiver to know when message was originally created. This adds
timestamp to messages and passes it via send proc. Client needs to
send it where possible. So far, MQTT format can't include it without
change, so I'm adding a new proto version. This change can read the
new version. Once that's well-enough distributed I can start sending
using it. Other transmission types than MQTT are for later.
Now we use only ISOCode string internally to identify languages, and
since that's universal it can be built into an wordlist and used
without the build of CrossWords knowing about that language
specifically (though it'll have to know about it to have the language
name be localizable.) For legacy support, though, the old int codes
are transmitted in invitations and URLs IFF available, otherwise the
string's used. If a newer build invites and older build to play in a
too-new language there will be trouble.
When I've invited a Known Player, use that player's name in parens in
scoreboard and games list elem/summary until a remote device connects
(usually in response to an invitation) and provides an actual player
name. Makes it much easier to tell one pending game from another. And
doesn't really work (yet) where there's more than one remote player in
a game.
The old API required passing dict into game creation/loading. New
doesn't, but in some places I was doing other stuff there (like checking
existance), so can't remove there. Still code goes away.
Once in the archive games don't ever send unless opened explicitly (no
resend-all-on-gained-network stuff for them). So don't offer to put a
game there if it has unsent (unacked) messages. Should prevent problem
of a host being archived before it's managed to send its final move to
all guests.
It's simpler this way, and I'm tired of stuff not happening because the
OS chooses not to schedule e.g. an invitation send for minutes. Goal's
to be running BluetoothServerSocket.accept() as much as possible when
there are active BT games in play OR when the game's in the foreground.
If that's happening, sent invitations and moves will be received when
users expect. When there's no traffic and app isn't being brought to
foreground, backoff will ensure I don't try to run accept() too often.
FWIW, BTLE seems to offer a better way to do this (to have an app be
responsive to incoming invitations when it hasn't run in the foreground
in a while), but it requires users to accept FINE_LOCATION
permission. I'm hoping I can make this work to avoid asking for that
permission.
