Add a third processor type to the .so, and fix first compile-time
warnings and then a few dumb bugs based on assumptions about ptr sizes.
Works to play networked games and browse wordlists, but is not
extensively tested and needs to be before release.
It's crashing all the time and involves a system that only exists in
debug builds. So I should understand the root cause, but other stuff
needs to get done first.
I can't reproduce this, but while testing recovery from DatagramSocket
recreation in RelayService got enough to know that somehow a timer's
procptr's not set. So test before calling, and log instead of crashing.
It's an error to use an env with the wrong thread, but it IS possible
for more than one thread to be associated with the same env. So don't
assert to the contrary.
Seeing the occasional crash and trying to plug leaks that might be
contributing. I think I fixed the Gameptr.finalize() assertions I've
been seeing forever but the thread match assertion remains. Logs will
help catch that.
I'm seeing an assertion failure in cleanup that could be explained by
the cleanup happening when initGame() has been called but no subsequent
jni method that would have added the env to the map. So let's add it
immediately so that can't happen.
It's useful when testing to have the remote device play without human
interaction. So add an option, and UI to trigger it, for the players
created remotely in response to an invitation to be robots. There are
guards in place to catch the feature slipping into a release build.
My VSIZE is no longer legal, and apparently there's no workaround (no
way to safely figure the length of an array whose size is known at
compile time.) To avoid the risk of duplicating little constants, added
macros that define length in a way a new VSIZE can pick it up. Couldn't
make that work for struct field arrays, however, so there I'm using
constants.
Put up an error message if too many tiles selected for trade
(a condition that couldn't exist when the pool was guaranteed to
have at least 7 in it.) (It's a hack: there's not even an enum
giving Spanish's code, and the lang_locale stuff in info.txt isn't
making it into the .xwd format.)
So now all jni code uses a single dutil context, but also a single
mempool and jniutil instance instead of new instances of the latter two
per game and dict-iteration.
A number of jni calls were "stateless", which meant they allocated their
own vtmgr and mpool instances each time invoked. Instead invoke them
with the global jni closure and add to it vtmgr (already has mpool) and
use these instead of allocating/freeing each time. To make sure no race
conditions are introduced (mpool, though debug-only, is probably not
thread-safe), guard these new uses with an in-use flag. If that fires
I'll need a mutex or something.
I like this better than the previous fix: rather than share a
thread->env map with the game world allocate a new one for each
iterator. This could cause problem if the iterator is used on threads
that don't currently call map_thread(), or if there are callbacks that
need to look up the env that I'm not aware of. Needs testing...
As reported to google, dict iterator destruction was crashing due to a
race condition if it happened after a game using the same dict had been
closed since it needed a mapped env that the game closure would
remove. Fixed in two ways, one by adding the mapping prior to the code
that uses it (a common pattern: add happens many times, whenver it might
be needed, but remove only once), and second by passing env into the
code that was crashing.
The mapping stuff remains inherently racy and I'm not sure now how to
fix that. It depends on there being a place to unmap after which it's
guaranteed the mapped value won't be needed again. When two
objects (game and dict_iter in this case) map the same env/thread combo
there's a race.
Added a wrapper function since for compatibility with the jni's encoding
the flags matter and need to be the same everywhere. Or at least there
should be no chance of their getting changed.
Add DEBUG-builds-only UI at the bottom of GameConfig for turning on the
comms feature dropping outgoing or incoming messages. The idea's to use
this to reproduce and fix stalls. There's a noticable slowdown opening
the GameConfig fragment, but it should all be no-op in a release build.
Make face-up tile picker util method return void and add mechanism for
passing in selected tiles asynchronously, as has been done recently with
the rest of the once-blocking util callbacks. Works perfectly in the gtk
case. Likely crashes in curses (if picking face-up option is on.) In
java all the callbacks are there but rather than put up a UI we pretend
the user says "pick 'em for me" each time. Putting up a UI is next.
Continue conversion of alerts that required blocking the JNI thread. Now
board_commitTurn() takes a second boolean indicating whether phonies
found have been approved by user. Common code informs user, and if he
approves client code calls board_commitTurn() again. In case where
turn's lost there's no call to make back, but there's the undesirable
change that if a robot moves next its move will be reported on top of
the turn-lost alert. Ideally new alerts would appear under, not on top
of, those that have not yet been dismissed.
Next step in converting util_ methods that required blocking: blank tile
assignment. Now post a query and add a method that the client code can
call when the user's decided. Include enough state (col, row, and
playerNum) so that it's probably pretty safe.
Probably breaks curses build, but for gtk and Android
turn move and trade confirmation into a two-step process, making
board_commitTurn() non-interactive when called with a second
parameter. The old blocking util methods now return void and it's up to
the client code to interact (on the main thread) then re-call
board_commitTurn() if appropriate.
First attempt to stop blocking the jni thread: instead of returning a
password from a util_ method, have it include enough state that the UI
can return, put up a dialog, and then pass that state and the password
back and have them matched up again. I think this will work for the
remaining blocking Alerts too.
