This is probably a temporary fix for Linux not being aggressive enough
about calling comms_resendAll() when opening a game. For now, though,
test scripts fail without it.
Creating an address record without having heard from the remote is
new, and setting it to an old version was preventing using new msg
format. So set to new by default. Not sure how it'll get downgraded
facing an old client, but a 100-game upgrade test passes.....
Looks like invitations become unsendable before they're deleted
sometimes and so block sending real messages. This fixes device
accepting invitation but never hearing back from host.
Duplicate messages early on, which happened only in the test script
but could have anywhere, broke connectivity. So don't kill address
records when a duplicate shows up. Dupes only escape message ID
checking early (before channel is established). I used to remove
address records when a message was rejected, but don't understand why
so removed that, though asserts show it's not mattering except for
those early messages.
There was some confusion around host and self addresses, where they're
created, default values, removing conTypes from defaults that are not
in received host addr, etc. I left in some asserts to help understand
if code that seems wrong but hard to fix is still getting called.
Current networking, based on invitations rather than a relay that
plays matchmaker, allows host to know its address when a game is
created, and for guest to know its host's address in
addition. Enforcing this makes inviting and rematching in common
code (coming soon) easier. Big change on Android is I used to create a
new game prior to passing it to GameConfigDelegate, but now I have to
wait for user to configure (including choosing how to communicate)
before I can create it.
