A rare stall resulted when the invitee on channel 2 responded
first. It would get assigned channel 1 and so the invitation on that
channel would get deleted. If it hadn't already reached the mqtt
server it would never be delivered. My fix is to use an invitation's
channel instead IFF its address matches the return address of the
incoming message. I'm not sure what happens if there's somehow a mix
of invited (via rematch) and invited-some-other-way players. None of
this matters for two-device games anyway.
When rematching, some users have a convention that e.g. lowest scoring
player in the "parent" game goes first. So allow that, providing the
choice on each rematch until a default has been chosen. Support
changing that default in a new prefs setting.
The place I chose to enforce the order was on the host as invitees are
registering and being assigned slots. But by then there's no longer
any connection to the game that was rematched, e.g. to use its
scores. So during the rematched game creation process I create and
store with the new game the necessary ordering information. For the
3-and-4 device case, it was also necessary to tweak the information
about other guests that the host sends guests (added during earlier
work on rematching.)
Server needs to not rematch if any device has more than one
player (for now, as I'm too lazy to fix this rare condition.) I'm
moving toward having the linux client write status to a unix socket on
exit rather than having the test script parse the log file for
status. GameOver is there now. Tile counts should follow.
Because only the host/inviter knows the addresses of all the devices
in a game it's hard for guests to rematch (unless it's a 2-device
game, as they know the host's address.) So now, as part of telling
guests the game is ready to play, include the addresses of other
guests. It's usually only 9 bytes per device, and only happens when
more than two devices are in a game.
No point in sending the old-topic-format MQTT messages to clients that
know about the new one, and in fact it's harmful. Devices in a game
already agree on the stream version to use and communicate it, so pass
that into comms once it's known and from there on to the device code
that builds mqtt messages.
Duplicate messages early on, which happened only in the test script
but could have anywhere, broke connectivity. So don't kill address
records when a duplicate shows up. Dupes only escape message ID
checking early (before channel is established). I used to remove
address records when a message was rejected, but don't understand why
so removed that, though asserts show it's not mattering except for
those early messages.
Remove legacy relay-inspired logic around comms addressing. Now when a
device creates a game it's required to provide its "self address," and
if it's a client, the address of the host (which it presumably got
through the invitation in response to which the game is being
created.) Then as registration messages come in from clients, the host
gathers their addresses as always.
Removed a boolean that seemed unnecessary. Stopped showing
move-explanations for robots in duplicate mode. They were being shown
too early thanks to bad logic, but I don't think there's any call for
them at all. A robot's move is only interesting if it's the one that
wins the turn.
The assertion's clearly blocking testing, but I'm not sure it's not an
error for two move explanations to want to co-exist. For now they're
concatenated.
