This is probably a temporary fix for Linux not being aggressive enough
about calling comms_resendAll() when opening a game. For now, though,
test scripts fail without it.
To prevent deleted games' ghost invitations from remaining as
persisted on a topic and so being received over and over, have
recipient of invitation send an empty message on the same topic to
remove them. Any message sent once the game start would have replaced
the invitation, but sometimes if the sender is deleted at the right
time there's none.
I'm looking for a test case to reproduce the Andorid situation where
invitations are never deleted from comms' queue and so prevent the
game from being considered over. Doesn't seem to happen in Linux, but
more tests are good.
This should complete sending to multiple topics (for backwards
compatibility) and supporting combined messages in the future (sending
them is hard; receiving not so much.)
I didn't understand MQTT at all. Per the docs anyway it only keeps a
message around if its "persist" flag is set, and then it only keeps
the most recent per topic. I expected that when a device connected,
messages would be waiting for it, but that's apparently not true (some
evidence to the contrary.) But having all games on a device share the
same topic means only one message can be waiting. So switch to
including gameID in the topic, subscribing to a wildcard topic and
sending to a different one per game. For now, for legacy purposes,
we'll keep sending to the old per-device topic.
Duplicate messages early on, which happened only in the test script
but could have anywhere, broke connectivity. So don't kill address
records when a duplicate shows up. Dupes only escape message ID
checking early (before channel is established). I used to remove
address records when a message was rejected, but don't understand why
so removed that, though asserts show it's not mattering except for
those early messages.
Add dutil proc haveGame() and use it to detect duplicate
invitations. I'm passing, but ignoring on android, the channel, which
means that for now you can't invite yourself and on-device testing
requires having CrossWords and CrossDbg or a second user.
There was some confusion around host and self addresses, where they're
created, default values, removing conTypes from defaults that are not
in received host addr, etc. I left in some asserts to help understand
if code that seems wrong but hard to fix is still getting called.
