Because only the host/inviter knows the addresses of all the devices
in a game it's hard for guests to rematch (unless it's a 2-device
game, as they know the host's address.) So now, as part of telling
guests the game is ready to play, include the addresses of other
guests. It's usually only 9 bytes per device, and only happens when
more than two devices are in a game.
No point in sending the old-topic-format MQTT messages to clients that
know about the new one, and in fact it's harmful. Devices in a game
already agree on the stream version to use and communicate it, so pass
that into comms once it's known and from there on to the device code
that builds mqtt messages.
Duplicate messages early on, which happened only in the test script
but could have anywhere, broke connectivity. So don't kill address
records when a duplicate shows up. Dupes only escape message ID
checking early (before channel is established). I used to remove
address records when a message was rejected, but don't understand why
so removed that, though asserts show it's not mattering except for
those early messages.
Remove legacy relay-inspired logic around comms addressing. Now when a
device creates a game it's required to provide its "self address," and
if it's a client, the address of the host (which it presumably got
through the invitation in response to which the game is being
created.) Then as registration messages come in from clients, the host
gathers their addresses as always.
Removed a boolean that seemed unnecessary. Stopped showing
move-explanations for robots in duplicate mode. They were being shown
too early thanks to bad logic, but I don't think there's any call for
them at all. A robot's move is only interesting if it's the one that
wins the turn.
The assertion's clearly blocking testing, but I'm not sure it's not an
error for two move explanations to want to co-exist. For now they're
concatenated.
There's code on all platforms to force user to have dict prior to
opening a game or responding to an invitation. "Empty" dict play hasn't
made sense in a long time.
Create new class that owns the alert. Let it decide whether to post,
remove, etc. Seems to work, but I've removed some of the "reinvite"
options I'm not sure were helpful anyway. To be considered...
Got as far as having gtk client display list of previously harvested
known players to be invited. Their addresses, or at least mqtt ids are
saved. Next is to actually invite one.
If a configured-as-host game joined an existing game the relay would
make it a guest. The android util_ callback for that change was only
implemented in BoardDelegate and so the change was dropped unless the
game was open/visible. Because comms recorded the change, though, the
callback would never be called again and so the game never learned to
behave as a guest and never registered: permanent failure to join game!
Implemented with a new server state so initClientConnection can be
called from server_do() instead of inside comms while processing an
incoming packet.
