I didn't understand MQTT at all. Per the docs anyway it only keeps a
message around if its "persist" flag is set, and then it only keeps
the most recent per topic. I expected that when a device connected,
messages would be waiting for it, but that's apparently not true (some
evidence to the contrary.) But having all games on a device share the
same topic means only one message can be waiting. So switch to
including gameID in the topic, subscribing to a wildcard topic and
sending to a different one per game. For now, for legacy purposes,
we'll keep sending to the old per-device topic.
Engine shouldn't be so stupid as to play a blank for 0 points. So when
comparing two moves, sort first on score, then use number of blanks
used to break any ties.
Duplicate messages early on, which happened only in the test script
but could have anywhere, broke connectivity. So don't kill address
records when a duplicate shows up. Dupes only escape message ID
checking early (before channel is established). I used to remove
address records when a message was rejected, but don't understand why
so removed that, though asserts show it's not mattering except for
those early messages.
Add dutil proc haveGame() and use it to detect duplicate
invitations. I'm passing, but ignoring on android, the channel, which
means that for now you can't invite yourself and on-device testing
requires having CrossWords and CrossDbg or a second user.
There was some confusion around host and self addresses, where they're
created, default values, removing conTypes from defaults that are not
in received host addr, etc. I left in some asserts to help understand
if code that seems wrong but hard to fix is still getting called.
Current networking, based on invitations rather than a relay that
plays matchmaker, allows host to know its address when a game is
created, and for guest to know its host's address in
addition. Enforcing this makes inviting and rematching in common
code (coming soon) easier. Big change on Android is I used to create a
new game prior to passing it to GameConfigDelegate, but now I have to
wait for user to configure (including choosing how to communicate)
before I can create it.
Remove legacy relay-inspired logic around comms addressing. Now when a
device creates a game it's required to provide its "self address," and
if it's a client, the address of the host (which it presumably got
through the invitation in response to which the game is being
created.) Then as registration messages come in from clients, the host
gathers their addresses as always.
