slackbuilds_ponce/development/openocd/0001-build-remove-warnings-with-gcc-11.patch
Matteo Bernardini baa8c900c8
development/openocd: Updated for version 0.11.0.
Signed-off-by: Matteo Bernardini <ponce@slackbuilds.org>

Signed-off-by: Willy Sudiarto Raharjo <willysr@slackbuilds.org>
2022-02-27 01:09:55 +07:00

83 lines
3 KiB
Diff

From 6db49eb8858023654084088c73d968e190aec491 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:38:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] build: remove warnings with gcc 11
This removes some warnings which prevent a successful build with -Werror
which is enabled by default. I'm using gcc 11, so maybe others are not
getting this warnings yet.
In src/flash/nor/numicro.c the debug messages were misleadingly indented.
In src/target/arm920t.c the array size where smaller than expected from
the receiving function.
Change-Id: I66f5c6a63beb9f9416e73b726299297476c884d8
Signed-off-by: Rene Kita <git@rkta.de>
Reviewed-on: http://openocd.zylin.com/6104
Reviewed-by: Jonathan McDowell <noodles-openocd@earth.li>
Tested-by: jenkins
Reviewed-by: Tomas Vanek <vanekt@fbl.cz>
Reviewed-by: Antonio Borneo <borneo.antonio@gmail.com>
---
src/flash/nor/numicro.c | 6 +++---
src/target/arm920t.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
index 7609fa81c..1971daa24 100644
--- a/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
+++ b/src/flash/nor/numicro.c
@@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static uint32_t numicro_fmc_cmd(struct target *target, uint32_t cmd, uint32_t ad
retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
return retval;
- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
if ((status & (ISPTRG_ISPGO)) == 0)
break;
if (timeout-- <= 0) {
@@ -1512,7 +1512,7 @@ static int numicro_erase(struct flash_bank *bank, unsigned int first,
retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
return retval;
- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
if (status == 0)
break;
if (timeout-- <= 0) {
@@ -1601,7 +1601,7 @@ static int numicro_write(struct flash_bank *bank, const uint8_t *buffer,
retval = target_read_u32(target, NUMICRO_FLASH_ISPTRG, &status);
if (retval != ERROR_OK)
return retval;
- LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
+ LOG_DEBUG("status: 0x%" PRIx32 "", status);
if (status == 0)
break;
if (timeout-- <= 0) {
diff --git a/src/target/arm920t.c b/src/target/arm920t.c
index 80f6d7045..a45dc6420 100644
--- a/src/target/arm920t.c
+++ b/src/target/arm920t.c
@@ -245,8 +245,8 @@ static int arm920t_read_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
uint32_t cp15_opcode, uint32_t address, uint32_t *value)
{
struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
- uint32_t *regs_p[1];
- uint32_t regs[2];
+ uint32_t *regs_p[16];
+ uint32_t regs[16];
uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ int arm920t_write_cp15_interpreted(struct target *target,
{
uint32_t cp15c15 = 0x0;
struct arm *arm = target_to_arm(target);
- uint32_t regs[2];
+ uint32_t regs[16];
struct reg *r = arm->core_cache->reg_list;
/* load value, address into R0, R1 */
--
2.35.1