slackbuilds_ponce/system/memtest86+/patches/bug_629506_message_15.mbox
Kyle Guinn 898d490968
system/memtest86+: Updated for version 5.01.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Guinn <elyk03@gmail.com>
2019-04-06 07:03:01 +07:00

142 lines
5.9 KiB
Text

From viro@ftp.linux.org.uk Fri Feb 27 20:21:34 2015
Received: (at 629506) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2015 20:21:34 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(2014-02-07) on buxtehude.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FOURLA,MONEY,
MURPHY_DRUGS_REL8,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,STOCKLIKE,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 43; hammy, 150; neutral, 234; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--UD:patch, 0.000-+--H*u:1.5.21,
0.000-+--H*UA:1.5.21, 0.000-+--H*u:2010-09-15, 0.000-+--H*UA:2010-09-15
Return-path: <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2])
by buxtehude.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
(Exim 4.80)
(envelope-from <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>)
id 1YRRPi-0007QW-72
for 629506@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:21:34 +0000
Received: from viro by ZenIV.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
id 1YRQyr-0000Hl-OS
for 629506@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:53:49 +0000
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 19:53:49 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: 629506@bugs.debian.org
Subject: memtest86+.bin crashes if loader ends up putting it not at 9000:0000
Message-ID: <20150227195349.GN29656@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
X-Greylist: delayed 1658 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at buxtehude; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 20:21:33 UTC
FWIW, the effects described in this bug report are 100% reproducible
on any version, as long as the loader (lilo, grub, whatever) ends up putting
the bootsect+setup in any location below 9000:0000.
zImage-type images consist of 3 parts - bootsect, setup and
payload. Payload is loaded at 1000:0, bootsect and setup - n:0 and
n+2:0 resp., near the top of lowmem. Payload is protected mode code,
setup - real mode one. Bootsect isn't executed at all; when the
same image is booted directly it would've been the only part loaded
by BIOS and it would copy itself and read the rest of the image to
expected locations and pass control to setup. Values in it can be
used by setup, though, so it must be present even when the image had been
brought in by a loader.
The thing is, we can't be guaranteed n == 0x9000. E.g. ACPI and
SMM have every right to use _anything_ in range 512K..1M for their
state, declaring it reserved. That's what BIOS int 0x12 is for - it
reports how high (in kilobytes) can you go in lowmem without running into
reserved areas. And while having it report 512K is rare, something like
20K reserved just below the VRAM (i.e. report 620K) is nothing unusual.
I hadn't looked into details of GRUB behaviour, but LILO puts its
secondary loader as high in lowmem as it can, then puts the bootsect and
setup parts of image below that. It tries to load at 9000:0 if possible,
but if there's no space, it'll go lower. With the sizes it uses 20K reserved
below 640K is enough to push bootsect + setup combination (just) below 9000:0.
And memtest86+ setup has that 0x9000 hardwired - this
gdt_48:
.word 0x800 # gdt limit=2048, 256 GDT entries
.word 512+gdt - start,0x9 # gdt base = 0X9xxxx
in setup.S really depends on 'start' (entry to setup) loaded at
0x90200 physical. Have it loaded at any other address and you'll trigger
an exception as soon as you try to assign any segment register after you switch
to protected mode. Which will escalate to triple-fault and reboot the
damn thing immediately.
GRUB might be better or worse in triggering that "load not at
9000:0" situation, but it can't possibly avoid it in all cases. If nothing
else, 9000:0 might be within one of the reserved areas. It simply isn't
guaranteed to be available, period.
Another issue is that setup of memtest86+ expects to see in %dx
the value left there by the bootsect of memtest86+. Fortunately, it's
not critical - in
movw $INITSEG, %ax
movw %ax, %ds
movw %ax, %es
movw %ax, %fs
movw %ax, %ss # reset the stack to INITSEG:0x4000-12.
movw %dx, %sp
push %cs
pop %ds
we really need only the last two instructions. The stack footprint
of what follows is fairly low *and* these values are not used past the
reload of segment registers immediately after protected mode switch.
It's not the only problem in there - the bits after
# start from grub-a20.patch
are clearly cargo-culted from grub, badly. There it was a part of a function
that expects an argument on stack (it can turn A20 both on and off) and that
got blindly copied, nevermind that the value on stack is random or that
we follow it with (unconditional) use of 8042-based method anyway. I'd rather
see upstream opinion on that particular piece of code first, though.
Anyway, the patch below fixes dependency on being loaded at 9000:0 and it
seems to work here without regressions. Have fun...
--- memtest86+-5.01/setup.S 2013-08-09 22:01:58.000000000 -0400
+++ fixed/setup.S 2015-02-27 14:18:47.000000000 -0500
@@ -26,14 +26,13 @@
# APs also execute this code
#ljmp $INITSEG, $(reload - start + 0x200)
reload:
- movw $INITSEG, %ax
- movw %ax, %ds
- movw %ax, %es
- movw %ax, %fs
- movw %ax, %ss # reset the stack to INITSEG:0x4000-12.
- movw %dx, %sp
+ xorl %eax, %eax
push %cs
- pop %ds
+ pop %ax
+ movw %ax, %ds
+ shll $4, %eax
+ addl %eax, (gdt_48 - start + 2)
+
lidt idt_48 - start # load idt with 0,0
lgdt gdt_48 - start # load gdt with whatever appropriate
@@ -88,6 +87,7 @@
movw %ax, %ds
movw %ax, %es
movw %ax, %ss
+ xorl %esp, %esp # 32bit code will set it then
movw %ax, %fs
movw %ax, %gs
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
gdt_48:
.word 0x800 # gdt limit=2048, 256 GDT entries
- .word 512+gdt - start,0x9 # gdt base = 0X9xxxx
+ .word gdt - start,0 # gdt base, needs to be adjusted
msg1:
.asciz "Setup.S\r\n"