Miroirs/cooperative-software-development
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/amyjko/cooperative-software-development synced 2024-12-26 21:58:27 +01:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Added paragraph about impact analysis.

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Andy Ko 2019-04-30 11:27:43 -07:00
parent 6fdb3a8611
commit efac5fe035
1 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

13
debugging.html
View file

@ -98,7 +98,18 @@
<h2>Fixing defects</h2> <h2>Fixing defects</h2>
<p>Once you've found the defect, what do you do? It turns out that there are usually many ways to repair a defect. How professional developers fix defects depends a lot on the circumstances: if they're near a release, they may not even fix it if it's too risky; if there's no pressure, and the fix requires major changes, they may refactor or even redesign the program to prevent the failure (<a href="#murphyhill">Murphy-Hill et al. 2013</a>). This can be a delicate, risky process: in one study of open source operating systems bug fixes, 27% of the incorrect fixes were made by developers who had never read the source code files they changed, suggesting that key to correct fixes is a deep comprehension of exactly how the defective code is intended to behave (<a href="#yin">Yin et al. 2011</a>).</p> <p>
Once you've found the defect, what do you do?
It turns out that there are usually many ways to repair a defect.
How professional developers fix defects depends a lot on the circumstances: if they're near a release, they may not even fix it if it's too risky; if there's no pressure, and the fix requires major changes, they may refactor or even redesign the program to prevent the failure (<a href="#murphyhill">Murphy-Hill et al. 2013</a>).
This can be a delicate, risky process: in one study of open source operating systems bug fixes, 27% of the incorrect fixes were made by developers who had never read the source code files they changed, suggesting that key to correct fixes is a deep comprehension of exactly how the defective code is intended to behave (<a href="#yin">Yin et al. 2011</a>).
</p>
<p>
This risks suggest the importance of <strong>impact analysis</strong>, the activity of systematically and precisely analyzing the consequences of some proposed fix.
This can involve analyzing dependencies that are affected by a bug fix, re-running manual and automated tests, and perhaps even running users tests to ensure that the way in which you fixed a bug does not inadvertently introduce problems with usability or workflow.
Debugging is therefore like surgery: slow, methodical, purposeful, and risk-averse.
</p>
<h2>Further reading</h2> <h2>Further reading</h2>