mirror of
https://github.com/amyjko/cooperative-software-development
synced 2024-12-26 21:58:27 +01:00
Consistent naming.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e26c0dab27
commit
7b386f5af7
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -48,10 +48,10 @@
|
|||
<td>Chapter 4. <a href="productivity.html">Productivity</a></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td>Chapter 5. <a href="quality.html">Software quality</a></td>
|
||||
<td>Chapter 5. <a href="quality.html">Quality</a></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td>Chapter 6. <a href="requirements.html">Requirements engineering</a></td>
|
||||
<td>Chapter 6. <a href="requirements.html">Requirements</a></td>
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
<tr>
|
||||
<td>Chapter 7. <a href="architecture.html">Architecture</a></td>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
|
|||
<img src="images/pomegranate.jpg" class="img-responsive" />
|
||||
<small>Credit: Anton Croos</small>
|
||||
|
||||
<h1>Software Quality</h1>
|
||||
<h1>Quality</h1>
|
||||
<div class="lead">Andrew J. Ko</div>
|
||||
|
||||
<p>There are numerous ways a software project can fail: projects can be over budget, they can ship late, they can fail to be useful, or they can simply not be useful enough. Evidence clearly shows that success is highly contextual and stakeholder-dependent: success might be financial, social, physical and even emotional, suggesting that software engineering success is a multifaceted variable that cannot explained simply by user satisfaction, profitability or meeting requirements, budgets and schedules (<a href="#ralph">Ralph & Kelly 2014</a>).</p>
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue