For a while now we had our code coverage tools tell us that the coverage
for one line of code fluctuated. Sometimes it was being executed and
other times it was not. This is useless noise.
I think what is happening here is that the coverage depends on the order
of iteration over a table. Either the tooltip that is being created was
first made visible and then it text changed, or things happened in the
opposite order.
Fix this by doing this by explicitly changing the tooltip's text while
it is surely visible.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This test changes the mouse cursor's position and afterwards has an
assert that checks something on the tooltip. This really looks a lot
like it expects the mouse cursor's position to be already updated and
its enter and leave events to be handled. However, this is now how
things actually work.
Fix this by moving the assert into its own step, so that in between the
normal main loop runs.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
