When we manage the transient before the main window, the client object's
.transient_for property would stay nil. This happens because the property points
to a window which we don't know (yet) and thus is ignored.
Fix this by remembering the value of WM_TRANSIENT_FOR and checking in
client_manage() if the new client is the "missing window we did not find
before".
Fixes: https://github.com/awesomeWM/awesome/issues/181
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This creates a new helper function for setting the transient_for property of a
client. This is a preparation for a following commit. No behaviour changes
intended.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
_NET_WM_ICON contains a list of icons and until now, the first one was
picked without regard to it's size. This adds a global option to set
the preferred icon size. When getting the client icon, the best size
match is picked. The size can be set via
awesome.set_preferred_icon_size() and the default is 0, which will pick
the smallest non-zero size icon available.
Signed-off-by: Lukáš Hrázký <lukkash@email.cz>
This fix two things:
(1) Clients asking to be urgent while focussed, this have been reported
a few time for urxvt and I usually link a patch that fix this. This may
not be considered a bug by some, but I think it is.
(2) Add the ability to stop noisy clients from setting the urgent state
themselves.
Fun fact: ICCCM specifies that icon_pixmap must have depth 1. Xterm uses a
pixmap with depth 24. Yay... As such, I don't have any test for the depth == 1
case and will just assume that it does the right thing. If it doesn't, I bet no
one will notice anyway.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Everything that needs the lua_State should create a local variable like this:
lua_State *L = globalconf_get_lua_State();
This ensures that the compiler warns if there are two variables with name "L" in
scope. The idea here is that it should become harder to accidentally use the
global lua state instead of the state of the current state.
While writing this commit, I found another place that gets its wrong: Reading
client.focus from a coroutine was broken, since it was returning the result on
the main thread instead of the current one.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Every .c file has to include the corresponding .h file first to make sure the
headers are self-contained. Additionally, this moves some unneeded includes
around.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This commits adds awesome.register_xproperty(). This allows lua code to register
arbitrary X11 properties with awesome which will then watch these properties.
Whenever such a property is changed on a client or drawin, we will emit the
xproperty::name signal.
This also adds window:get_xproperty(name) and window:set_xproperty(name, value)
which allows to mess with properties.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The code in property_update_wm_transient_for() looked at the transient_for
relation before the new transient got set. However, the code is supposed to
check if we get a loop after introducing this new transient_for.
Thus, if we arrive back at the client that we started from, we can be sure that
there is a cycle. Signal this by setting the loop counter high enough to abort
the loop and make the rest of this function do nothing.
No idea how I missed this case before nor why I cannot reproduce this on debian,
but can reproduce it on Arch just fine.
Reported-By: Kasimir Knallkopf at http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.window-managers.awesome/10415
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Lots of code assumes that it can recursively follow a client's transient_for
field until it reached an end without a transient_for client. Instead of fixing
all those places to properly handle loops, this patch just makes us ignore
WM_TRANSIENT_FOR if the property causes a loop.
This means that it can be a little random which WM_TRANSIENT_FOR property is
ignored, because it will always be the one that happens to complete the cycle. I
don't think that this is bad, because there shouldn't be any loops in the first
place.
Lots-of-kudos-to: David Mohr <david@mcbf.net>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Now that the C code uses lightuserdata for passing around cairo surfaces, they
are no longer automatically garbage collected. To avoid memleaks, this commit
compares the C code to use cairo_surface_t pointers instead of the lua stack.
This also fixes a memleak were a client's icon was leaked.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This option is no longer valid in modelines, so it has been removed from
all modelines using the following shellscript:
#!/bin/ksh
git ls-tree -r HEAD | cut -f2 | while read f; do
egrep -e '^(//|--) vim: .*encoding=' $f >/dev/null || continue
sed -E -e '/^(\/\/|--) vim:/s/:encoding=utf-8//' $f > /tmp/foo
mv /tmp/foo $f
done
Signed-off-by: Gregor Best <gbe@ring0.de>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
xcb-util is now split into several repositories since 0.3.8. This
release also cleaned up the API a lot, thus update the code
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Fontaine <arnau@debian.org>
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Previously, client_set_icon() popped the image that was being used. When I made
this use oocairo, I accidentally made this function not pop anything at all, so
the caller has to do this now.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
This makes awesome support only a single X11 protocol screen. If you are still
using zaphod mode, you can run multiple instances of awesome on the single
screens, e.g.:
DISPLAY=:1.0 awesome & DISPLAY=:1.1 awesome &
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Since each handler is only for one single atom, there is no point in passing the
atom that was changed to the callback.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Instead of calling each property handler with a property reply, it's now up to
the handlers to request the properties.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
For each property we handle, there is now a function which sends a request and
returns the cookie and a second function that takes the cookie and saves the
result in the client_t struct. This should make it possible to improve our
latency later on.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
We no longer use libxcb-event, so we don't have to follow it's API any more.
This means the pointless arguments and return values can be removed.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Upstream removed most of the code from libxcb-event and there is no
event-related stuff left in this library. We now no longer use any of the parts
that were removed.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
We no longer have to follow libxcb-property's API for these function, so we can
remove arguments which we don't use anyway.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
libxcb-property will be dropped from xcb-utils in the next release, because
upstream thinks it's not really useful and well-designed.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
The memory referred to by the reply argument of
property_update_wm_protocols is automatically free'd
by xcb later on, so it is not safe to simply use the
value of reply in our own data structures. If we did
this, future calls to xcb_get_wm_protocols_reply_wipe
free the data which has already been free'd by xcb,
causing a double-free and corrupting the heap. In
addition, it isn't safe to use free'd memory as if
it is still allocated. Instead, duplicate the data
referred to by reply and use the duplicate instead.
It seems to me as if the duplication should actually
be done in xcb_get_wm_protocols_from_reply, but I'm
not really sure. If that is the case, this is simply
a work-around until xcb can be fixed.
Signed-off-by: Ari Entlich <atrigent@ccs.neu.edu>
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
property_update_wm_hints() pushes the client but never pops it. This is a really
bad thing (tm).
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
Without this patch c.class shows the instance and vice versa.
Signed-off-by: koniu <gkusnierz@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
Instead of using the given atom name it always requested the WM_NAME property of
a client.
Signed-off-by: Uli Schlachter <psychon@znc.in>
Signed-off-by: Julien Danjou <julien@danjou.info>
