mirror of
https://github.com/c3d/DB48X-on-DM42.git
synced 2024-09-28 03:20:53 +02:00
Add freedom covenant to that repository
Signed-off-by: Christophe de Dinechin <christophe@dinechin.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
701f9e3b8c
commit
33ba10a3b5
1 changed files with 311 additions and 0 deletions
311
FREEDOM_COVENANT.txt
Normal file
311
FREEDOM_COVENANT.txt
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,311 @@
|
|||
THE FREEDOM COVENANT
|
||||
|
||||
Version 1.06, March 30, 2021
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Free Software is all about freedom. This freedom, as Richard Stallman repeatedly
|
||||
pointed out, is not about "free beer", but about "free speech". In other words,
|
||||
the freedom of free software corresponds not to the French word "gratuit", but
|
||||
to a much nobler word, "Liberté", the first of the three pillars of the French
|
||||
motto, "Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité".
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom has always been under attack, and this goes way beyond Free Software.
|
||||
The natural tendency of human beings is to grab power, and achieving that
|
||||
objective very often requires, in the mind of the power grabber, the restriction
|
||||
of freedom of others. From shrink-wrap licenses to dictatorial regimes, the same
|
||||
principle applies in a continuum: restricting someone's freedom to gain power.
|
||||
This friction between the liberties of different individuals is where most
|
||||
conflicts come from.
|
||||
|
||||
This desire to restrict the freedom of others also lives deep within each of us.
|
||||
It takes courageous individuals to go against that innate desire for power and
|
||||
truly defend freedom. Courage is required because accepting the freedom for
|
||||
others often requires a deliberate and conscious restraint of one's own.
|
||||
|
||||
In addition to courage, defending freedom could use tools and methods, because
|
||||
our daily routine makes it easy to overlook admirable core principles.
|
||||
Our words and our deeds rarely align. Doing is harder than wishing.
|
||||
|
||||
This is the reason for this covenant, which anyone can freely adopt as a
|
||||
reminder of what it takes to truly respect the freedom of others.
|
||||
Here are the guiding principles of this covenant:
|
||||
|
||||
0. Act out of love
|
||||
1. Speak the truth
|
||||
2. Share your facts
|
||||
3. Mind your feelings
|
||||
4. Keep your opinions
|
||||
5. Forgive and apologize
|
||||
6. Discuss
|
||||
7. Contribute and be thankful
|
||||
8. Provide friendly feedback
|
||||
9. Act out of love
|
||||
|
||||
By publicly adhering to this covenant, or any variant thereof that suits your
|
||||
personal taste better, you simply state that these principles are in line with
|
||||
how you want to act, and you encourage others to gently remind you of these
|
||||
principles should you violate them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
END OF THE FREEDOM COVENANT
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
USAGE
|
||||
|
||||
If you agree with this covenant, simply share it along, for example by putting
|
||||
it in your repositories, on your web sites or linking to it in your signature.
|
||||
|
||||
If you disagree with part or all of the wording, feel free to adapt it to your
|
||||
preference or even write your own freedom covenant.
|
||||
|
||||
Should you make alterations to this text that you think are valuable to others,
|
||||
please share them back through the repositories below. I will do my best to
|
||||
integrate the changes that I personally like (which includes any correction to
|
||||
spelling or grammar), and to record changes I dislike as publicly visible git
|
||||
branches in the repository so that others can choose them at their preference.
|
||||
|
||||
https://github.com/c3d/freedom-covenant
|
||||
https://gitlab.com/c3d/freedom-covenant
|
||||
|
||||
Free Software projects are encouraged to adopt this covenant as a guideline,
|
||||
with the full understanding that adhering to such a covenant can only be a
|
||||
personal and free decision, and should never be required from anyone.
|
||||
This covenant is specifically not written as an enforceable code of conduct.
|
||||
|
||||
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
DISCUSSION
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a more in-depth discussion of the meaning of the principles outlined
|
||||
above, highlighting how and why they relate to freedom.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
0. Act out of love
|
||||
|
||||
The best contributors to Free Software are often very passionate individuals,
|
||||
who can talk about their projects for hours, and more if beer is involved.
|
||||
This passion can be harnessed in a positive way, but it can also easily lead
|
||||
down a destructive path, including anger or hatred.
|
||||
|
||||
Love, whether for individuals or for the projects or products you work on, is
|
||||
the best remedy against such negative passions. By loving others, you can fully
|
||||
enjoy their freedom, and be happy with them when they exercise it.
|
||||
|
||||
When individuals you love do something that you disagree with, acting out of
|
||||
love will ensure that you seek a resolution that is in their best interest,
|
||||
instead of attempting to gain control over them and restrain their freedom.
|
||||
|
||||
Even in the worst case, we should seek to act towards one another like a parent
|
||||
teaching a misbehaving kid more than like a cop putting a criminal in jail.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
1. Speak the truth
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom applies to yourself, and that includes your right to say what you
|
||||
believe to be true, irrespective of what others may think about it.
|
||||
|
||||
If you are in a position where you cannot say what you truly believe, your
|
||||
liberty has already been infringed upon. It is already way past time to find the
|
||||
courage to speak up. Be ready for the consequences, because those who reveal
|
||||
inconvenient truths are not welcome by those who need silence to preserve
|
||||
their own power. This is one of the prices to pay for freedom.
|
||||
|
||||
Like all others, this principle is subject to principle 0. You may choose to
|
||||
refrain from stating things that you believe to be true, simply because they may
|
||||
cause harm to others. You need to carefully balance the need for openness and
|
||||
transparency with the right to privacy or beliefs.
|
||||
|
||||
Be mindful that you don't own the objective truth. You can at best state what
|
||||
you sincerely believe is true. As a result, you need to fully accept that
|
||||
others, following the same guiding principle, may still end up with a different
|
||||
or even opposite belief. Speaking the truth requires remaining open to the truth
|
||||
at all times, and therefore being ready to change your mind.
|
||||
|
||||
The right to shout "fire" in a crowded theater is often cited as an example of
|
||||
limit to free speech. But if there is a fire, you should feel obligated to shout
|
||||
"fire" even if this may cause a panic and other harm.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
2. Share your facts
|
||||
|
||||
True freedom depends on accurate information. Nobody can make an informed
|
||||
decision without having correct data.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, your respect for the freedom of others requires that you share any
|
||||
fact you have that is relevant to their own decision making. This sharing
|
||||
should include not just the conclusions, but also ways for others to verify your
|
||||
facts, such as sources, tools or methods.
|
||||
|
||||
To understand how this relates to freedom, imagine that you get run over by a
|
||||
bus. Do others around you still have a way to make progress without you? If not,
|
||||
would it be because you held onto a parcel of personal power? Deliberately
|
||||
holding to information may grant you a little bit of power, but it comes at the
|
||||
expense of the freedom of others.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
3. Mind your feelings
|
||||
|
||||
We all have feelings, and they may be overwhelming. Unlike facts, however,
|
||||
feelings are difficult to share and communicate, and they are often not directly
|
||||
relevant or applicable to others.
|
||||
|
||||
As a result, there are two equally bad ways to deal with feelings: bottling them
|
||||
up, or treating them as universal facts.
|
||||
|
||||
Bottling feelings up is bad, because it will lead you to behaviors that will
|
||||
appear erratic or hard to understand to others. In doing so, you deprive them of
|
||||
facts that are actually relevant in their interaction with you.
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, your feelings are not universally acceptable facts. They are
|
||||
personal emotions that others may not feel at all. This includes feelings such
|
||||
as outrage, pride, joy or love.
|
||||
|
||||
It is perfectly OK to share that you are outraged by someone's actions, but it
|
||||
is not acceptable to demand that everyone be outraged the same way, just as it
|
||||
is ridiculous to assume that everyone loves chocolate simply because you do.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
4. Keep your opinions
|
||||
|
||||
Like feelings, opinions are personal. Like feelings, they can be shared, but
|
||||
they will not be universally accepted.
|
||||
|
||||
If you have trouble distinguishing facts from opinions, a good rule of thumb is
|
||||
that opinions are ideas others can disagree with. The vast majority of what we
|
||||
often incorrectly treat as facts are, in reality, mere opinions. This includes
|
||||
all the statements in this document, which represent only the opinions of its
|
||||
author.
|
||||
|
||||
Freedom includes the freedom of opinion. This means that you can keep your
|
||||
opinion and do not have to subject it to any kind of majority rule. Dissenting
|
||||
opinions are what fuel progress in science. Of course, try to be as informed as
|
||||
possible in your opinions, but remain aware of what you don't know.
|
||||
|
||||
Treat your opinions and the opinions of others with the same respect. If you
|
||||
cannot hear a dissenting viewpoint without feeling uncomfortable, work on
|
||||
yourself before trying to change other people's minds -- if only because the
|
||||
chances that you can change yourself are somewhat higher.
|
||||
|
||||
Try to acknowledge disagreement in a way that maintains the dialogue open.
|
||||
It may be better to use a phrase like "I learned something today" than a phrase
|
||||
like "let's agree to disagree", if and when the latter can be misinterpreted
|
||||
as "end of discussion".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
5. Forgive and apologize
|
||||
|
||||
We all make mistakes. What makes a difference is how we deal with them.
|
||||
|
||||
Even without any ill-will or deliberate intent, we may cause harm. Apologies
|
||||
help soothe bad feelings, irrespective of any objective fault. I am often not
|
||||
the best person to judge if someone else was harmed by what I did, so I'd better
|
||||
be cautious and conservative about it. Feel free to apologize even if you truly
|
||||
believe you did nothing wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
The necessary counterpart to apologies is true forgiveness. Forgiveness is not
|
||||
about forgetting problems, but about putting them behind us. Since we are
|
||||
creatures of habit, we often repeat our mistakes, so we often need to forgive
|
||||
the same person multiple times for the same offense. This is a mark of true
|
||||
courage and strength.
|
||||
|
||||
Apologies and forgiveness restore our freedom. They allow us to return to a
|
||||
normal train of thought that is not obsessed with the harm done.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
6. Discuss
|
||||
|
||||
We are social creatures, and we cannot truly be free if we are isolated.
|
||||
To make any progress together, we need a constant exchange of ideas, an ongoing
|
||||
discussion. Interrupted dialogue is often the first sign of something going
|
||||
wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
The style of the discussion is something that is extremely personal. Individuals
|
||||
who are closer to one another will often speed up the discussion by using more
|
||||
direct language than they would with more distant third parties.
|
||||
|
||||
On our modern electronic communication channels, this often leads to incorrect
|
||||
interpretation of the "tone" of the discussion, because the person who wrote had
|
||||
one particular person in mind, but the message is read personally by all
|
||||
others. This has been the source of many misinterpretations.
|
||||
|
||||
This is why it is extremely important to remember the earlier principles during
|
||||
any discussion, and notably to be able to separate facts, feelings and opinions,
|
||||
as well as to express quick apologies and forgiveness.
|
||||
|
||||
Debate ideas, not people. Criticizing or rejecting an idea is generally accepted
|
||||
whereas criticizing or rejecting a person is generally more problematic, and can
|
||||
even lead to violence or hatred.
|
||||
|
||||
A good discussion increases the level of love, trust and respect between
|
||||
participants. This is the true measure of success.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. Contribute and be thankful
|
||||
|
||||
An often under-appreciated aspect of Free Software is the freedom to contribute.
|
||||
Yet this freedom is the primary reason for the success of the movement.
|
||||
|
||||
Free Software is an incredible gift, that now powers many aspects of our lives.
|
||||
We need to be thankful for all the amazing contributors who dedicate time and
|
||||
talent to this collective endeavour.
|
||||
|
||||
One way to be thankful is to improve on the existing work, and to add your own
|
||||
personal piece to it. Free Software is that place where even correcting someone
|
||||
else's mistake is seen as a true mark of appreciation and respect. This constant
|
||||
feedback loop is what makes Free Software so good. Anyone willing is welcome to
|
||||
contribute. Nobody needs anyone else's permission to get started.
|
||||
|
||||
This does not just apply to code, but to the community as well. Discussion,
|
||||
debate and even sharp criticism are essential to achieving true freedom.
|
||||
In particular, criticism of problematic individual behaviors is necessary, and
|
||||
happens regularly. However, our love for the code and for the contributors means
|
||||
that our objective should always be improvement, not destruction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
8. Provide friendly feedback
|
||||
|
||||
Nothing we do is ever perfect, and Free Software is no exception. Bad code, bad
|
||||
processes or bad behaviors are inevitable, and we continuously seek to redress
|
||||
such situations. Good code, good processes and good behaviors are much harder to
|
||||
achieve. They require a lot of effort, and require ongoing motivation and
|
||||
continuous engagement.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore, praise liberally and publicly, show appreciation whenever you can.
|
||||
A mere "thank you" goes a long way towards making someone have a nice day.
|
||||
Showing sincere signs of appreciation is the most efficient guide to greatness.
|
||||
|
||||
Conversely, show restraint and moderation in your negative judgments.
|
||||
Having a negative opinion of a piece of code or of an individual is part of your
|
||||
fundamental freedom. But it is rarely productive to express it aloud.
|
||||
Complaining publicly that some code is a piece of crap never fixed a bug.
|
||||
Privately holding that opinion, on the other hand, may be a powerful motivator
|
||||
to fix that sad piece of utter junk obviously written by a drunk monkey - Oh,
|
||||
wait, that was me!
|
||||
|
||||
Should a need arise for some kind of more serious corrective action, try to do
|
||||
so in a way that respects the individual freedoms of everyone at hand. Remain
|
||||
friendly, and always seek a positive resolution.
|
||||
|
||||
Start with friendly, private feedback, stating as clearly as possible the
|
||||
problem that you see and the most important improvement that you have in mind.
|
||||
If that fails, consider bringing a small group of individuals to discuss the
|
||||
problem. If you need to resort to a vote or similar arbitration mechanism to
|
||||
resolve a conflict, be ready to accept an outcome that does not go your way.
|
||||
|
||||
Coercive actions, public threats, insults or collective retaliation are almost
|
||||
never justified nor justifiable, because they infringe on the basic freedom of
|
||||
the targets of the action. Irrespective of who is involved, such actions run
|
||||
directly counter to the most fundamental value of Free Software, freedom.
|
||||
|
||||
It is always more difficult to discuss, convince and forgive than to silence,
|
||||
coerce and punish. However, it remains the right thing to do, because this is
|
||||
the only approach that truly respects individual freedoms.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
9. Act out of love
|
||||
|
||||
This brings us back full circle.
|
||||
|
||||
Acting out of love brings the best in us as well as in the community.
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue